Are you flying tomorrow for Thanksgiving? Brace yourself. Standing between you and your turkey dinner at Grandma’s could be a perfect storm of long lines and ticked-off travelers at the airport.
The Wednesday before Thanksgiving has always been one of the year’s busiest travel days (to give you an idea, Boston’s Logan Airport is expecting 100,000 fliers tomorrow — about 30,000 more than normal). But this year, the combination of the TSA’s new security procedures and a traveler-led protest of those procedures could make the usual long holiday lines even worse.
Virginia resident Brian Sodergren created National Opt-Out Day to urge fliers to opt out of the TSA’s new full body scanners and go through a more time-consuming pat-down instead. He encourages fliers to be patted down in public because “Every citizen must see for themselves how the TSA treats law-abiding citizens.”
Frankly, considering that videos of the pat-downs have been splashed all over the media already for the last few weeks, I can’t imagine that the protest is going to raise too much awareness — or do much beyond irritating travelers who simply want to catch their flight and get home for Thanksgiving.
There’s no way to know how many travelers will take part in National Opt-Out Day until it happens, but here are some tips for getting through the airport as swiftly and smoothly as possible tomorrow:
Allow plenty of time. I generally recommend arriving two hours early for a non-peak domestic flight (longer for an international one). Tomorrow I’d allow three or four hours, just in case.
Know what to expect. The new scanners haven’t made it to every security line in every U.S. airport yet, so you may go through the same old metal detector that you’re already used to. But you’ll want to read up on the pat-downs and full body scanners as well so that you’re familiar with all of your options. The TSA offers a list of airports that have the new scanners (though there have been rumors that the list is not 100 percent accurate).
Be polite. Arguing with or abusing the security officers at the checkpoint is not only a great way to slow down your screening but also an unfair way to treat people who are simply carrying out policies they had no hand in creating. Many of them don’t like the TSA’s new procedures any more than you do. Consider a little Thanksgiving kindness to help get all of us through a potentially very rough day.
–written by Sarah Schlichter
In light of the recent controversy surrounding the TSA’s new airport security procedures — you know, those revealing full-body scanners and extra-thorough pat-downs — we wanted to find out what you, our readers, really think about all the hoopla. Shockingly, a whopping 34 percent of readers polled said “Both the scanners and the pat-downs are outrageous; I would rather not fly.”
This is according to a poll posted on our travel message boards, which is still open for votes. (Haven’t weighed in yet? Share your opinion!) The second most popular poll choice, currently at 32 percent, is “I hate both the scanners and the pat-downs, but I will choose one in order to travel.” Eighteen percent of voters don’t have any problem with the new procedures.
Whew! We’re glad to know that most people will continue flying despite recent — and unpopular — airport security changes. Still, the number of voters who have declared an end to their air-traveling days is unsettling. Almost every other continent can only be reached by air or sea (fun fact: it is possible to drive from North America to South America, taking a bridge over the Panama Canal) and a cruise ship will only get you so far. For those of us who want to see the world, air travel is pretty much indispensable.
What do you say? Are you seriously considering taking the scissors to your frequent flier card?
For more information on the controversy, check out From Pat-Downs to Full Body Scanners: The TSA Firestorm, which offers a hard, factual look at the new security changes.
– written by Caroline Costello
A few weeks after ExpressJet pilot Michael Roberts made waves at the airport security checkpoint by refusing both a full body scan and an enhanced pat-down, the TSA once again finds itself embroiled in controversy.
This time it was a California man, John Tyner, who came up against the TSA’s new security procedures. Tyner was selected to go through a full body scan at the San Diego airport; because he refused, he was taken aside for a pat-down. When the screener described the pat-down procedure, which was to include a manual exploration of Tyner’s hips, thighs and groin, Tyner responded, “If you touch my junk, I’ll have you arrested” — prompting the screening officer to call for a supervisor. In the end, Tyner was not permitted to fly, and he could face a fine and/or a civil lawsuit from the TSA for failing to complete the full security check before leaving the screening area.
Here’s a report (with video from Tyner’s cell phone) from CNN:
To read Tyner’s account and watch the unedited video of the incident, check out his blog.
Meanwhile, another pilot has joined Michael Roberts in standing up against the new security procedures. Continental pilot Ann Poe, who has an artificial hip that has necessitated additional screening in the past, declined to go through the full body scanner on November 4 due to concerns about radiation and the violation of medical privacy laws. She also objected to the enhanced pat-down, which she describes as “being sexually molested.” She was detained for two hours and prevented from flying her scheduled route.
Poe and Roberts aren’t alone; several pilot unions have also spoken out against the full body scanners and enhanced pat-down procedures.
If you face a choice between a full body scan and a pat-down on your next flight, what will you choose? Do you think the new screening procedures are fair?
–written by Sarah Schlichter
We’ve all heard the stories of 2-year-olds and little old ladies being hassled at airport security because they share a name with someone on the no-fly list. As of today, the TSA has taken steps toward greater security (and, hopefully, the freedom of flying toddlers everywhere) with the full institution of its new Secure Flight program.
If you’ve made a flight reservation in the last year or so, you’ve probably been prompted to provide your full name, birth date and gender at some point during the booking process. This isn’t your airline being nosy — it’s part of the phasing-in process for Secure Flight. All airlines, booking sites and travel agents must have this information on file in order to send it to the TSA before you fly; the TSA will then use it to check your identity against the government’s official no-fly list. If your identity is cleared, you’ll be issued a boarding pass. If not, you will be subject to further screening at the airport before you can fly.
What does all this mean for you? You must be sure that your airline, travel agent or booking site has the information above on file for you before your trip. If you’ve had issues with the no-fly list in the past, you can also request and supply a “redress number” from the TSA when booking.
The TSA emphasizes that the name on your reservation must match the name on the government-issued ID you plan to use — so if your driver’s license lists you as Margaret, forget about booking a flight as “Maggie.” If you’ve just gotten married or divorced but haven’t changed the name on your passport, book your flight under the last name that matches your ID. (The TSA notes that small differences, such as a middle initial versus a middle name, shouldn’t be enough to keep you from flying.)
It’s important to be aware that the Secure Flight screening process takes place before you ever arrive at the airport, and does not replace the in-person screening of your boarding pass and ID at the security checkpoint.
To learn more about how your next flight could be affected, check out TSA’s Secure Flight Program: What It Means for You.
–written by Sarah Schlichter
An ExpressJet pilot recently reported to work at Memphis International Airport and touched off what has turned into a firestorm of controversy.
The pilot, Michael Roberts, refused to go through one of the TSA’s new full body scanning machines, reports the Baltimore Sun. The machines, which are being introduced in select airports around the country, use advanced imaging technology to produce a rather revealing picture of a passenger’s naked body — and they’ve sparked debates about the importance of individual privacy versus safety in the air. The health risks of the machines, which emit low levels of radiation, have also been questioned. (The TSA claims the radiation is well within acceptable limits.)
Roberts — like all airline passengers — was permitted to opt out of the full body scan. However, he also refused his second option, a manual pat-down. “I’m not onboard with federal agents putting their hands on me every time I go to work,” he tells the Sun. Because he refused both the full body scan and the pat-down, he was denied access to the airport and sent home — and now his job may be in jeopardy. He is planning to file a lawsuit against the TSA.
Many travelers are celebrating Roberts’ protest as a heroic struggle for privacy and civil rights. But the TSA defends itself in a recent blog post (which coyly does not mention Roberts by name), stating that everyone — including flight crew and TSA agents — is subject to airport security, and that “security is not optional.”
While I’m hardly one to defend the TSA, I’m not so sure I agree with Roberts either; is a pat-down really that big a deal? But then again, I haven’t yet had to go through one of the new full body scans. Readers, what’s your take — do you think a pat-down is a reasonable alternative to the full body scan, or is Roberts justified in standing up to the TSA?
–written by Sarah Schlichter
By now, most of us are accustomed to the tedious but familiar procedures of airport security: wait in mile-long line, take off shoes, pull out quart-size plastic bag of 3.4-ounce liquids and gels, place metal items in tray, step through scanner, fumble to put belongings back in order while shuffling around in untied shoes. But wouldn’t it be great if we could cut out a few of those steps?
Within a few years, maybe we can — thanks to a couple of up-and-coming security screening devices.
The Associated Press reports that a new bottled liquid scanner, now being tested in New Mexico by the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency, could be a more effective way for airport security screeners to identify liquid explosives. The scanner uses magnetic resonance to determine the molecular makeup of liquids, and is so sensitive that it can distinguish between red and white wine, says the AP. A machine this advanced could potentially make the TSA’s confusing liquid and gel restrictions obsolete, and allow air travelers to once again bring water bottles or full-size tubes of toothpaste through the security checkpoint.
While the new liquid scanner is probably still a few years away from being implemented in U.S. airports, another innovative security device, the MagShoe, has been used for several years at Tel Aviv’s Ben-Gurion International Airport and was recently tested at an unidentified airport in Western Europe. The MagShoe is one of several machines designed to scan travelers’ feet and ankles for metal without necessitating the removal of shoes.
The TSA has tested similar technologies in the past without success, but announced earlier this year that it would give the latest crop of shoe-scanning devices a try, reports USA Today. Unsurprisingly, the TSA notes that many travelers find removing their shoes to be the biggest hassle of the screening procedure.
Will the U.S. will eventually adopt any of these new technologies? We’ll keep you posted.
–written by Sarah Schlichter
It’s official: we’re blogging! Welcome to “Have Tips, Will Travel,” where we’ll bring you quick takes on travel news, need-to-know info for travelers, and discussions on travel-related controversies and issues of the day (click here to read more about our new blog). Let’s get started.
On IndependentTraveler.com, we have travel deals, trip planning ideas, community forums and packing tips galore. But did you know we answer travel questions as well?
Our readers can send their burning questions to travel wizard (and Editor) Sarah Schlichter at firstname.lastname@example.org. While we’ve been asked about everything from passports to pet travel, the most popular questions we’ve received, by far, are about which foods can be carried through airport security. Ever since the TSA declared that all carry-on liquids and gels must be in 3.4-ounce containers within a single clear, quart-sized zip-top bag, countless readers have been e-mailing us to ask what kinds of foods they can bring on a plane. Is tuna salad a “gel”? (It’s close enough that it could be confiscated.) What about a mushy banana or a slice of cheesecake? (Probably ok.) Here’s a question we received last fall:
“I’d like to take Thanksgiving dinner to my son. I thought I would take cooked turkey, mashed potatoes and stuffing, but a friend said I probably can’t take it on the plane. Please let me know.”
These kinds of questions make us hungry for lunch. They also make us chuckle at the bizarre issues that come up in trip planning. Here’s Sarah’s answer:
“Thanks for writing to IndependentTraveler.com. You’d probably be okay to bring the turkey and stuffing, since those are both solid, but because the mashed potatoes are a gel-like substance, they would be subject to the 3-1-1 rules. That means you could only bring 3.4 ounces or less, and the container would have to fit inside a quart-size plastic bag. I’m sure your son will appreciate two out of three!”
Did our reader bring her son a zip-top bag filled with tiny containers of mashed potatoes, cranberry sauce and gravy? We’ll never know. But we do hope that her Thanksgiving bounty wasn’t confiscated by some hungry TSA agent. After all, checkpoint clearance is always subject to the discretion of individual TSA agents, and the TSA’s lists of approved items are not set in stone.
Those of you struggling with similar questions should take a look at the TSA Helpful Hints for Holiday Travelers page, which has a list of foods that can be taken on a plane. Or you can post your travel questions or comments below — we’ll be happy to answer!